Stokes v. Township of Piscataway

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Stokes v. Township of Piscataway

606 A.2d 353, 127 N.J. 534

DecidedDecember 31, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 606 A.2d 353 (Stokes v. Township of Piscataway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stokes v. Township of Piscataway, 606 A.2d 353, 127 N.J. 534 (N.J. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Leave to appeal is granted, and the order of the trial court is summarily modified to permit plaintiff to perform only such roofing and siding work as may be necessary to protect the structure from damage during the pendency of the litigation; and it is further

ORDERED that any such work shall be undertaken at plaintiffs own risk and without prejudice to the township’s right to have such work removed on completion of the litigation should plaintiff fail to prevail. See Rowatti v. Gonchar, 101 N.J. 46, 500 A.2d 381 (1985). Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leave to appeal is granted, and the order of the trial court is summarily modified to permit plaintiff to perform only such roofing and siding work as may be necessary to protect the structure from damage during the pendency of the litigation; and it is further

ORDERED that any such work shall be undertaken at plaintiffs own risk and without prejudice to the township’s right to have such work removed on completion of the litigation should plaintiff fail to prevail. See Rowatti v. Gonchar, 101 N.J. 46, 500 A.2d 381 (1985). Jurisdiction is not retained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

606 A.2d 353, 127 N.J. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-township-of-piscataway-nj-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack