Stokes v. Stuckey

12 S.C.L. 562
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 15, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 12 S.C.L. 562 (Stokes v. Stuckey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stokes v. Stuckey, 12 S.C.L. 562 (S.C. 1822).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gantt

delivered the opinion of the court.

The motion for a nonsuit was properly overruled. The evidence is by no means certain, to shew that the expression did specifically allude to the circumstance of the cotton carried to the plaintiff’s gin; it was rather an inference of the counsel, than the conclusion of the witness, or judge presiding.

The witness only supposed, and perhaps correctly, that such was the allusion of the defendant, in making use of the expression he did. But although that were the fact, it would not alter the law of the case.

The plaintiff might steal cotton entrusted with him to gin. He might be guilty of such a breach of trust, as would amount to a felony; and this he was charged with having done in the present case.

There is no ground of appeal in this case, and the motion is refused.

Justices Nott, Cokoek, Éichardson and Huger, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 S.C.L. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-stuckey-sc-1822.