Stokes v. State
This text of 1968 OK CR 106 (Stokes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff in Error, Thurman Purcell Stokes, on the 12th day of June, 1968, filed [532]*532in this Court an attempted appeal from the Order Revoking a previous Order Suspending Judgment and Sentence in Tulsa County District Court case no. 22,917.
In Burgett v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 362 P. 2d 975, this Court held that an order revoking an order suspending judgment and sentence is not a judgment and sentence within the meaning of our appeal statute, and. therefore, is not reviewable on direct appeal.
In accordance with Burgett, supra, this attempted appeal is hereby dismissed [without prejudice to a subsequent filing of a habeas corpus proceeding] and the Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1968 OK CR 106, 442 P.2d 531, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1968.