Stokes v. State

1962 OK CR 94, 383 P.2d 37, 1962 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 196
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 25, 1962
DocketNo. A-12949
StatusPublished

This text of 1962 OK CR 94 (Stokes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stokes v. State, 1962 OK CR 94, 383 P.2d 37, 1962 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 196 (Okla. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinions

NIX, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was charged by Information with the crime of Obtaining Money Under False Pretenses in Seminole County, ■Oklahoma. He was tried before a jury who found the defendant Guilty, left the punishment up to the trial judge, who sentenced defendant to a term of 2 years in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary.

Defendant appeals to this Court by petition in error, and a case-made containing excerpts from the record. There was no Judgment and Sentence in the case-made. Nor has one been filed of record. There appears in the Clerk’s file a certified copy of the Judgment and Sentence, but the Clerk refuses to file same because he has no recollection of it being presented to him. Pie says it just appeared in the file. Examination of the record after the time for appeal had long since expired revealed no Judgment and Sentence. The Judgment and Sentence did not appear in the Clerk’s file in time to convey Jurisdiction upon the Court, even if it had been properly filed. This Court has consistently held:

“Where appeal was taken from alleged judgment of conviction and the transcript of record or casemade contains no copy of the judgment and sentence of the trial court, this court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal, and such appeal will be dismissed.”

See Peters v. State, Okl.Cr., 365 P.2d 174; Moran v. State, Okl.Cr., 333 P.2d 318; Patton v. State, 60 Okl.Cr. 409, 64 P.2d 1245; Payne v. State, 84 Okl.Cr. 166, 180 P.2d 193.

For the foregoing reason, the purported appeal is hereby dismissed.

BRETT, J., not participating. BUSSEY, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Payne v. State
1947 OK CR 50 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1947)
Patton v. State
1937 OK CR 21 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1937)
Moran v. State
1958 OK CR 112 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1958)
Peters v. State
1961 OK CR 85 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1962 OK CR 94, 383 P.2d 37, 1962 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1962.