Stokes v. Moorman

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 4, 2011
• Docket: 10-7411
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7411

CHARLES MICHAEL STOKES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANDREW MOORMAN, sued in his individual and official capacities,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (9:10-cv-01711-CMC)

Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Michael Stokes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles M. Stokes appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stokes

v. Moorman, No. 9:10-cv-01711-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED