Stokes v. Moore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Stokes v. Moore

142 S.E. 169, 165 Ga. 684, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 47

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 17, 1928·No. No. 6083·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for new trial. The only grounds of the motion are that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it, decidedly and strongly against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to law and the principles of justice and equity. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for new trial. The only grounds of the motion are that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it, decidedly and strongly against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to law and the principles of justice and equity. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Stokes v. Moore, 142 S.E. 169, 165 Ga. 684, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 47 (Ga. 1928).

Pincite

142 S.E. 169 (Stokes v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.