Stokes v. Moore
This text of 142 S.E. 169 (Stokes v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for new trial. The only grounds of the motion are that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it, decidedly and strongly against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to law and the principles of justice and equity. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 S.E. 169, 165 Ga. 684, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-moore-ga-1928.