Stokes v. Lemon & Gale Co.

52 So. 457, 96 Miss. 868
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 So. 457 (Stokes v. Lemon & Gale Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stokes v. Lemon & Gale Co., 52 So. 457, 96 Miss. 868 (Mich. 1910).

Opinion

Whitfield, C.

Tbe notice published by the administrator in this case was as follows: “Notice to Creditors. Whereas, I was duly appointed administrator to the estate of Julius Stotes, deceased, by the chancery court of Madison county, Mississippi, on the 21st day of April, 1908, and having qualified as such: Now, therefore, all persons having claims against the estate of said deceased will probate and file the same within a year from date or the same will be barred.”

It is insisted that this notice is absolutely null and void; that the word “register” should be used instead of the word “file;” and that the failure to use that word “register” vitiates the whole notice. This is far too technical a view. The notice is a substantial compliance with the law. It is conceded that the claim of the appellee .was barred, unless this notice was absolutely void, so as to operate as no notice at all.

It follows that the decree of the court below is reversed, and the bill dismissed.

Pee Oubiam:. The above opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. John Deere Plow Co.
54 So. 948 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 So. 457, 96 Miss. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-lemon-gale-co-miss-1910.