Stokes v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stokes v. Lavine

51 A.D.2d 1021, 381 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1021 (Stokes v. Lavine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stokes v. Lavine, 51 A.D.2d 1021, 381 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the respondent State Commissioner of Social Services, dated January 6, 1975, which, after a statutory fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the respondent Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services, which denied petitioner’s application for a grant of assistance for moving and storage expenses, she appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 23, 1975, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion, the State Commissioner’s determination is supported by substantial evidence. Latham, Acting P. J., Damiani, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the respondent State Commissioner of Social Services, dated January 6, 1975, which, after a statutory fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the respondent Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services, which denied petitioner’s application for a grant of assistance for moving and storage expenses, she appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 23, 1975, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion, the State Commissioner’s determination is supported by substantial evidence. Latham, Acting P. J., Damiani, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1021, 381 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-lavine-nyappdiv-1976.