Stokes v. Howard
450 S.W.2d 520
Opinion
The sole question on this appeal being whether a parole violator, who subsequently committed and was convicted of other felonies, is entitled to credit for time spent out on parole toward the completion of his sentences, the answer is that he is not. KRS 439.344 and KRS 439.354; Eldridge v. Howard, Ky., 427 S.W.2d 579 (1968).
The judgment denying habeas corpus is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stokes v. Howard, 450 S.W.2d 520 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970).
450 S.W.2d 520 (Stokes v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kassulke v. Briscoe-Wade
105 S.W.3d 403 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2003)
Hobbs v. Commonwealth
690 S.W.2d 771 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1985)