Stokes v. Hardy
67 A. 1105, 74 N.J.L. 851, 45 Vroom 851, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 236
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice. Dixon in that court, reported in 44 Vroom 255.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Seed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stokes v. Hardy, 67 A. 1105, 74 N.J.L. 851, 45 Vroom 851, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 236 (N.J. 1907).
67 A. 1105 (Stokes v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Terhune v. Reed
67 A. 180 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1907)