Stokes v. Hardy
67 A. 1105, 74 N.J.L. 851, 45 Vroom 851, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 236
This text of 67 A. 1105 (Stokes v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stokes v. Hardy, 67 A. 1105, 74 N.J.L. 851, 45 Vroom 851, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 236 (N.J. 1907).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice. Dixon in that court, reported in 44 Vroom 255.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Seed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Terhune v. Reed
67 A. 180 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
67 A. 1105, 74 N.J.L. 851, 45 Vroom 851, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-hardy-nj-1907.