Stokes v. Fidelity Bank of New Smyrna

126 So. 815, 99 Fla. 478
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 815 (Stokes v. Fidelity Bank of New Smyrna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stokes v. Fidelity Bank of New Smyrna, 126 So. 815, 99 Fla. 478 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 So. 815, 99 Fla. 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-fidelity-bank-of-new-smyrna-fla-1930.