Stokes v. Fidelity Bank of New Smyrna

Supreme Court of Florida

Stokes v. Fidelity Bank of New Smyrna

126 So. 815, 99 Fla. 478

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 8, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Stokes v. Fidelity Bank of New Smyrna, 126 So. 815, 99 Fla. 478 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

126 So. 815 (Stokes v. Fidelity Bank of New Smyrna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.