Stokes v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Stokes v. Angelone

110 F. App'x 301

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2004·No. No. 04-1393·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Millis J. Stokes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stokes v. Angelone, No. CA-03-869-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Millis J. Stokes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stokes v. Angelone, No. CA-03-869-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Stokes v. Angelone, 110 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

110 F. App'x 301 (Stokes v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.