Stoker v. Stoker
This text of 742 So. 2d 357 (Stoker v. Stoker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edward W. STOKER, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Donna M. STOKER, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*358 David R. Singha, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.
Alison B. Copley, Sebring, and Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Edward W. Stoker, Jr. (husband) appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage determining that Donna M. Stoker (wife) is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. The order establishing the wife's entitlement to attorney's fees provides that the fee amount would be determined at a subsequent date. This court has previously held that an order merely establishing entitlement to attorney's fees is a nonappealable, nonfinal order. See Ritter v. Ritter, 690 So.2d 1372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services on Behalf of McCarthy v. McCarthy, 645 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Therefore, we dismiss this appeal without prejudice to appeal a subsequent final order setting the amount of attorney's fees.
Dismissed.
THREADGILL, A.C.J., and GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
742 So. 2d 357, 1999 WL 606668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoker-v-stoker-fladistctapp-1999.