Stoker v. State

449 So. 2d 408, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12888
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 1984·No. No. 83-762·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

Defendant was convicted and sentenced for robbery with a weapon, in violation of section 812.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), and grand theft, in violation of section 812.014(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). Defendant raises three points on appeal. We find no merit in defendant’s first contention that photograph lineup identification procedures were improperly conducted. As to defendant’s second point, we find no double jeopardy in his convictions.

We agree with defendant’s last point and strike that portion of his sentence which requires him to pay restitution as a condition of parole. See Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Alexander v. State, 425 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoker v. State, 449 So. 2d 408, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12888 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

449 So. 2d 408 (Stoker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shivers v. State
468 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)