Stokely v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 7871 (Stokely v. UMG Recordings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered January 28, 2016, which denied defendant Universal Music Publishing Inc.’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
On behalf of himself and others similarly situated, plaintiff William E. Stokely, III, seeks unpaid minimum wage and overtime compensation from defendants Universal Music Publishing Inc. and UMG Recordings, Inc., which entities the complaint refers to “collectively” as “Defendant.” Plaintiff alleges that he worked as an unpaid intern for “Defendant.” In support of his allegation that defendants are single and/or joint employers, plaintiff asserts bare legal conclusions (see Ullmann v Norma Kamali, Inc., 207 AD2d 691, 692 [1st Dept 1994]). There are no factual allegations that would support a finding of joint- or single-employer liability against Universal (see e.g. Shiflett v Scores Holding Co., Inc., 601 Fed Appx 28, 30 [2d Cir 2015]; Batilo v Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co., Inc., 140 AD3d 637 [1st Dept 2016]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 NY Slip Op 7871, 144 A.D.3d 575, 40 N.Y.S.3d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokely-v-umg-recordings-inc-nyappdiv-2016.