STOK + KON, P.A. v. CITY OF HALLANADALE BEACH
This text of STOK + KON, P.A. v. CITY OF HALLANADALE BEACH (STOK + KON, P.A. v. CITY OF HALLANADALE BEACH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
STOK + KON, P.A., a Florida Limited Partnership d/b/a STOK KON + BRAVERMAN, Appellant,
v.
THE CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, a political subdivision of Broward County, Florida, of the State of Florida; CATHIE SCHANZ, an individual; DANIEL ROSEMOND, an individual; KEVIN KLOPP, an individual; PRH BEACHWALK BEACHCLUB, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; PRH-2600 HALLANDALE BEACH, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; and THE GREATER DAYTON HOLDING COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a SOUTH FLORIDA PADDLE BOARDS AND WATERSPORTS ASSOCIATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
No. 4D21-1569
[May 12, 2022]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Keathan Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-13243 CACE (12).
David M. Robbins and Robert A. Stok of Stok Kon + Braverman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
David Casals of Trial Lawyers of Florida, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee The Greater Dayton Holding Companies, Inc., d/b/a South Florida Paddle Boards and Watersports Association, a Florida Corporation.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
STOK + KON, P.A. v. CITY OF HALLANADALE BEACH, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stok-kon-pa-v-city-of-hallanadale-beach-fladistctapp-2022.