STOK + KON, P.A. v. CITY OF HALLANADALE BEACH

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 2022·No. 21-1569·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

STOK + KON, P.A., a Florida Limited Partnership d/b/a STOK KON + BRAVERMAN,

Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, a political subdivision of Broward County, Florida, of the State of Florida; CATHIE SCHANZ, an individual; DANIEL ROSEMOND, an individual; KEVIN KLOPP, an individual; PRH BEACHWALK BEACHCLUB, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company;

PRH-2600 HALLANDALE BEACH, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; and THE GREATER DAYTON HOLDING COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a SOUTH FLORIDA PADDLE BOARDS AND WATERSPORTS ASSOCIATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D21-1569

[May 12, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Keathan Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-13243 CACE (12).

David M. Robbins and Robert A. Stok of Stok Kon + Braverman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

David Casals of Trial Lawyers of Florida, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee The Greater Dayton Holding Companies, Inc., d/b/a South Florida Paddle Boards and Watersports Association, a Florida Corporation.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STOK + KON, P.A. v. CITY OF HALLANADALE BEACH, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

STOK + KON, P.A. v. CITY OF HALLANADALE BEACH (STOK + KON, P.A. v. CITY OF HALLANADALE BEACH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.