Stok + Kon, P.A., etc. v. Miami Dade College
This text of Stok + Kon, P.A., etc. v. Miami Dade College (Stok + Kon, P.A., etc. v. Miami Dade College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 27, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-0190 Lower Tribunal No. 21-5958 ________________
Stok + Kon, P.A., etc., Appellant,
vs.
Miami Dade College, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.
Stok Kon + Braverman, and Robert A. Stok, Joshua R. Kon and Yosef Kudan (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.
Mark Migdal & Hayden, and Jose M. Ferrer and Darci E. Cohen, for appellee.
Before EMAS, SCALES, and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Appellant Stok + Kon, P.A. appeals a December 6, 2022 final judgment
awarding statutory attorney’s fees and costs to appellee Miami-Dade
College. Notwithstanding appellee’s failure to plead entitlement to fees, we
affirm the trial court’s determination that the exception to the pleading
requirement established in Stockman v. Downs, 573 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 1991)
is applicable.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stok + Kon, P.A., etc. v. Miami Dade College, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stok-kon-pa-etc-v-miami-dade-college-fladistctapp-2024.