Stojan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stojan v. State

861 S.W.2d 829, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1549, 1993 WL 387196

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 5, 1993·No. No. 63594·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing after he pleaded guilty to two counts of sale of a controlled substance. We find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(1) and (5).

We further find an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A [830]*830memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing after he pleaded guilty to two counts of sale of a controlled substance. We find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(1) and (5).

We further find an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A [830]*830memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Stojan v. State, 861 S.W.2d 829, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1549, 1993 WL 387196 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

861 S.W.2d 829 (Stojan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.