Stoia v. Francis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stoia v. Francis

658 So. 2d 150, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 1995 WL 407639

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 12, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2889

StatusPublished

This text of 658 So. 2d 150 (Stoia v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stoia v. Francis, 658 So. 2d 150, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 1995 WL 407639 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant purchaser that the issue of whether, taken together, the parties’ written and faxed communications contained all the essential terms of an enforceable contract for the sale of real property was improperly resolved by a judgment on the pleadings for the defendants sellers. See Mehler v. Huston, 57 So.2d 836 (Fla.1952); Bluevack, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co., 331 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Accordingly the judgment is reversed for further consistent proceedings below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant purchaser that the issue of whether, taken together, the parties’ written and faxed communications contained all the essential terms of an enforceable contract for the sale of real property was improperly resolved by a judgment on the pleadings for the defendants sellers. See Mehler v. Huston, 57 So.2d 836 (Fla.1952); Bluevack, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co., 331 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Accordingly the judgment is reversed for further consistent proceedings below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

658 So. 2d 150, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 1995 WL 407639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoia-v-francis-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack