Stoia v. Francis
658 So. 2d 150, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 1995 WL 407639
Opinion
We agree with the appellant purchaser that the issue of whether, taken together, the parties’ written and faxed communications contained all the essential terms of an enforceable contract for the sale of real property was improperly resolved by a judgment on the pleadings for the defendants sellers. See Mehler v. Huston, 57 So.2d 836 (Fla.1952); Bluevack, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co., 331 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
Accordingly the judgment is reversed for further consistent proceedings below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stoia v. Francis, 658 So. 2d 150, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 1995 WL 407639 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
658 So. 2d 150 (Stoia v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mehler v. Huston
57 So. 2d 836 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Bluevack, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co. of Florida
331 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)