Stohl v. Stohl

52 A.2d 853, 140 N.J. Eq. 107, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 476
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 15, 1947
StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.2d 853 (Stohl v. Stohl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stohl v. Stohl, 52 A.2d 853, 140 N.J. Eq. 107, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 476 (N.J. 1947).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 220.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Hehbr, Colie, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, MoGbehan, JJ. 10. For reversal — Wachenfeld, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stohl v. Stohl
47 A.2d 559 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.2d 853, 140 N.J. Eq. 107, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stohl-v-stohl-nj-1947.