Stogsdill v. SCDHHS
This text of Stogsdill v. SCDHHS (Stogsdill v. SCDHHS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Richard Stogsdill, Petitioner,
v.
South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002513
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from the Administrative Law Court
Carolyn C. Matthews, Administrative Law Judge
Opinion No. 27601
Heard November 17, 2015 – Filed January 20, 2016
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Patricia Logan Harrison, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Richard G. Hepfer, of Columbia, for Respondent.
Anna Maria Darwin and Sarah Garland St. Onge, both of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae Protection and Advocacy for People with Disabilities, Inc.; Andrew J. Atkins, of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae South Carolina Chapter of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys; and Stephen Suggs, of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Stogsdill v. South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, 410 S.C. 273, 763 S.E.2d 638 (Ct. App. 2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stogsdill v. SCDHHS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stogsdill-v-scdhhs-sc-2016.