Stogsdill v. Asadorian

531 S.W.3d 105
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 24, 2017
DocketNo. ED 105002
StatusPublished

This text of 531 S.W.3d 105 (Stogsdill v. Asadorian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stogsdill v. Asadorian, 531 S.W.3d 105 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Higus Asadorian, individually and as Trustee of the Higus L. Asadorian Trust, and the Higus L. Asadorian Trust (Appellants) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Barbara Stogsdill, Sharon Dash, and Bill Blacksher, as Trustees of Riverwood Estates Homeowners Association (Respondents), and entry of a permanent injunction against Appellants on Respondents’ claims related to a violation of a restrictive covenant. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there are no genuine issues of material fact and Respondents are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 74.04(c); ITT Comm. Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.
854 S.W.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 S.W.3d 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stogsdill-v-asadorian-moctapp-2017.