Stofsky v. Seigler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stofsky v. Seigler

241 A.D. 702

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence on the question of damages in favor of Pauline Stofsky, the amount allowed being inadequate, and on the ground that the verdict for defendants against the plaintiff husband is inconsistent with the verdict in favor of the wife, Pauline Stofsky. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Qarswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence on the question of damages in favor of Pauline Stofsky, the amount allowed being inadequate, and on the ground that the verdict for defendants against the plaintiff husband is inconsistent with the verdict in favor of the wife, Pauline Stofsky. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Qarswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Stofsky v. Seigler, 241 A.D. 702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 702 (Stofsky v. Seigler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.