Stoever v. Immell
1 Watts 258
Opinion
If the proceeding were imperfect when the act under which it was begun expired, what has been done since is simply void, and needs no reversal. It has, however, not been thought to be directly examinable here. The books show no instance of it, and we are satisfied the present attempt cannot be sustained.
Writ of certiorari quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stoever v. Immell, 1 Watts 258 (Pa. 1832).
1 Watts 258 (Stoever v. Immell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
B. Ganoe v. Bureau of Driver Licensing
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2021
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Bogert
59 A. 100 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
City of Detroit v. Chapin
37 L.R.A. 391 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)
Texas Mexican Railway Co. v. Jarvis
15 S.W. 1089 (Texas Supreme Court, 1891)
Johnson v. Hahn
4 Neb. 139 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1875)
Teague v. State
2 Morr. St. Cas. 1364 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Rice v. Wright
46 Miss. 679 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Commonwealth ex rel. Gest v. Councils of Pittsburgh
43 Pa. 391 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1862)
Hickory Tree Road
43 Pa. 139 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1862)
Tivey v. People ex rel. Townsend North
8 Mich. 128 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1860)
Bank of St. Mary's v. State
12 Ga. 475 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1853)
Fenelon's Petition
7 Pa. 173 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1848)
Butler v. Palmer
1 Hill & Den. 324 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)
Abbott v. Commonwealth
8 Watts 517 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1839)
Commonwealth v. Marshall
28 Mass. 351 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1831)