Stoecker v. Guido

63 A.D.2d 1007

This text of 63 A.D.2d 1007 (Stoecker v. Guido) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stoecker v. Guido, 63 A.D.2d 1007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of respondent, both dated July 9, 1976 and made after a hearing, which found petitioners Nunley and Stoecker guilty of certain specifications and fined them five days’ pay and one day’s pay, respectively. Determinations confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. The record reveals that the determinations of the respondent are supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Settepani v Guido, 57 AD2d 558; Matter of Collins v Codd, 38 NY2d 269) and that the penalties imposed were not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Latham, J. P., Damiani, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. Codd
342 N.E.2d 524 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Settepani v. Guido
57 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A.D.2d 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoecker-v-guido-nyappdiv-1978.