Stodick v. Cupp
431 F.2d 1229
This text of 431 F.2d 1229 (Stodick v. Cupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stodick v. Cupp, 431 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1970).
Opinion
It was not error to deny appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The error in state trial on which appellant relies was admission without objection of testimony by a police officer that in response to an inquiry as to ownership of an automobile appellant had stated: “I’d rather not say.” On this record this was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
431 F.2d 1229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stodick-v-cupp-ca9-1970.