Stoddard v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 2024·No. 2023-2017·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2023-2017 _____________________________

RUSSELL A. STODDARD,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

August 14, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004); Farmer v. State, 268 So. 3d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (“It is well established that eighteen is the dividing line between adult privileges and responsibilities and the privileges and responsibilities of children. We decline the invitation to treat this adult murderer as a child.”).

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Russell A. Stoddard, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoddard v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Stoddard v. State of Florida (Stoddard v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
James Farmer v. State of Florida
268 So. 3d 1009 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)