Stoddard v. State of Florida
This text of Stoddard v. State of Florida (Stoddard v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-2017 _____________________________
RUSSELL A. STODDARD,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
August 14, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004); Farmer v. State, 268 So. 3d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (“It is well established that eighteen is the dividing line between adult privileges and responsibilities and the privileges and responsibilities of children. We decline the invitation to treat this adult murderer as a child.”).
ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Russell A. Stoddard, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stoddard v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoddard-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.