Stoddard v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-2017 _____________________________
RUSSELL A. STODDARD,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
August 14, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004); Farmer v. State, 268 So. 3d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (“It is well established that eighteen is the dividing line between adult privileges and responsibilities and the privileges and responsibilities of children. We decline the invitation to treat this adult murderer as a child.”).
ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Russell A. Stoddard, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stoddard v. State of Florida (Stoddard v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.