Stoddard v. State

185 So. 3d 696, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1977, 2016 WL 626151
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 2016·No. 2D14-4198·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

[697] PER CURIAM.

Misty Stoddard appeals her judgment and sentence for felony murder. She argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motion for judgment of acquittal. However, Ms. Stoddard’s argument on appeal differs substantially from the argument she raised before the trial court on her motion. Thus, she failed to preserve the argument she now presents to us. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985). After carefully reviewing the record for fundamental error, we cannot say the trial court erred in denying her motion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and sentence.

Affirmed.

LUCAS, J., Concurs. ALTENBERND, J., Concurs with opinion. VILLANTI, C.J., Concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoddard v. State, 185 So. 3d 696, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1977, 2016 WL 626151 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

185 So. 3d 696 (Stoddard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related