Stoddard v. Roland

9 S.E. 741, 31 S.C. 600, 1889 S.C. LEXIS 9
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stoddard v. Roland. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 S.C. 342
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 17, 1889·No. No. 2425·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Motion to reinstate appeal dismissed by the clerk of this court for failure to file return within time. Motion granted, it appearing that the parties had within the time agreed upon a statement of the case as a return which was thereupon filed with the clerk of the Circuit Court and handed to the printer, and that the failure to file a copy with the clerk of this court within time resulted from the delay of the printer in printing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoddard v. Roland, 9 S.E. 741, 31 S.C. 600, 1889 S.C. LEXIS 9 (S.C. 1889).

9 S.E. 741 (Stoddard v. Roland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.