Stoddard v. Kelly

171 A.D. 927

Opinion

— The ordinary rule to receive an occupant’s declarations to characterize his possession and claim of title as adverse (Morss v. Salisbury, 48 N. Y. 636, 642; Wigm. Ev. § 1778; Chamberlayne Ev. § 2602), was specially applicable to declarations by James Kelly, deceased, because some fragmentary statements as to his original occupation had already been elicited by plaintiff’s counsel. For excluding such testimony by the witness Hard-castle, the judgments must be severally reversed and new trials granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoddard v. Kelly, 171 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

171 A.D. 927 (Stoddard v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morss v. . Salisbury
48 N.Y. 636 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)