Stoddard v. Coffin
This text of 10 Wend. 602 (Stoddard v. Coffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
The defendant having been a
resident of this state for at least one month previous to the commencement of the suit against him, the motion must be-granted. Law of 1831, p. 396, §. 2. The objection that the-debt respecting which the suit is brought was fraudulently contracted, cannot be heard in opposition to-this motion. If facts exist authorizing the arrest of a party within the provisions of the statute, the mode pointed out in the statute must be pursued, and the defendant then will have an opportunity to controvert the allegations of the plaintiff which now he-would not have,, should the opposition to his motion now set up be entertained.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Wend. 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoddard-v-coffin-nysupct-1833.