Stoddard v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stoddard v. City of New York

16 A.D.2d 680, 227 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10304

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 16, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 680 (Stoddard v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stoddard v. City of New York, 16 A.D.2d 680, 227 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, then three years and nine months old, as a result of a fire in an unimproved privately-owned lot, the action being brought on the theory that defendant failed to furnish adequate police supervision either to prevent the setting of such fire on .the premises or to abate the fire, plaintiff appeals: (a) from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 16, 1961, which granted defendant’s motion, made under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint; and (b) from the judgment of said court, dated April 3,1961, entered on such order. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, then three years and nine months old, as a result of a fire in an unimproved privately-owned lot, the action being brought on the theory that defendant failed to furnish adequate police supervision either to prevent the setting of such fire on .the premises or to abate the fire, plaintiff appeals: (a) from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 16, 1961, which granted defendant’s motion, made under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint; and (b) from the judgment of said court, dated April 3,1961, entered on such order. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 680, 227 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoddard-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1962.