Stoddard v. Churchill Line
140 S.E. 778, 37 Ga. App. 347, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 668
This text of 140 S.E. 778 (Stoddard v. Churchill Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stoddard v. Churchill Line, 140 S.E. 778, 37 Ga. App. 347, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 668 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
The ease, by consent of both parties, was submitted to the court, without the intervention of a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts, and the court did not err in rendering a judgment in favor of the defendant, or thereafter in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Southern Railway Co. v. Gore
58 S.E. 180 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Strickland v. Bank of Cartersville
81 S.E. 886 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)
Young v. Durham
84 S.E. 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
140 S.E. 778, 37 Ga. App. 347, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoddard-v-churchill-line-gactapp-1927.