Stoddard v. Brewer

16 N.W.2d 652, 310 Mich. 22
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 30, 1944
DocketDocket No. 71, Calendar No. 42,856.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 N.W.2d 652 (Stoddard v. Brewer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stoddard v. Brewer, 16 N.W.2d 652, 310 Mich. 22 (Mich. 1944).

Opinion

The bill in this case was filed to restrain, by injunction, threatened action at law by defendant against plaintiff upon the ground that transactions between the parties, as reduced to writing, *Page 23 were determined to be contrary to public policy in Brewer v.Stoddard, 309 Mich. 119.

Defendant states:

"In Brewer v. Stoddard, 309 Mich. 119, plaintiff proceeded upon the theory that all prior agreements between the parties were merged in the contract of June 10, 1940, upon which that suit was brought. In the action now before the court he bases his claim of right to recover upon the pre-existing contract because the contract of June 10, 1940, has been held unenforceable."

If the holding in the former case is res judicata of the issues in the threatened action then plaintiff herein will have adequate protection at law. We find nothing calling for equity intervention.

Dismissal of the bill is affirmed, with costs to defendant.

NORTH, C.J., and STARR, BUTZEL, BUSHNELL, SHARPE, BOYLES, and REID, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hooker Chemicals & Plastic Corp v. Attorney General
298 N.W.2d 710 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.W.2d 652, 310 Mich. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoddard-v-brewer-mich-1944.