Stockum v. State
139 N.E. 855, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 72, 106 Ohio St. 249, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 242
Opinion
1. The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States does not control nor is it a limitation upon the criminal procedure -of the several states. (Prescott v. State, 19 Ohio St., 184, approved and followed.)
2. Imprisonment “at hard labor” of a person convicted of an offense under Section 1654, General Code, is lawful and does not violate any provision of the federal or state constitution.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stockum v. State, 139 N.E. 855, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 72, 106 Ohio St. 249, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 242 (Ohio 1922).
139 N.E. 855 (Stockum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Webster v. State Ex Rel. Altick
195 N.E. 548 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1935)
Municipal Court v. State ex rel. Platter
126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 103 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1933)
Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.
184 N.E. 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1933)
State v. Kassay
184 N.E. 521 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1932)
Stewart v. State
181 N.E. 111 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)
Ingham v. State
172 N.E. 401 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1929)
Sheward v. State
159 N.E. 831 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)