Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. Brock

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. Brock

349 So. 2d 175, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16502

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 1977

DocketNo. CC-455

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 349 So. 2d 175 (Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. Brock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. Brock, 349 So. 2d 175, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16502 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is axiomatic that the findings of a trial judge sitting as a trier of fact without a jury are entitled to the same presumption of correctness as is accorded to a jury verdict. Our examination of the record, consideration of the briefs by able counsel and the hearing of oral argument fails to reveal prejudicial error. Accordingly, the final judgment here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It is axiomatic that the findings of a trial judge sitting as a trier of fact without a jury are entitled to the same presumption of correctness as is accorded to a jury verdict. Our examination of the record, consideration of the briefs by able counsel and the hearing of oral argument fails to reveal prejudicial error. Accordingly, the final judgment here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

349 So. 2d 175, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stockton-whatley-davin-co-v-brock-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack