Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. Brock
349 So. 2d 175, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16502
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 1977·No. No. CC-455·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
It is axiomatic that the findings of a trial judge sitting as a trier of fact without a jury are entitled to the same presumption of correctness as is accorded to a jury verdict. Our examination of the record, consideration of the briefs by able counsel and the hearing of oral argument fails to reveal prejudicial error. Accordingly, the final judgment here appealed is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. Brock, 349 So. 2d 175, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16502 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
349 So. 2d 175 (Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. Brock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peacock v. Melvin
652 So. 2d 951 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)