Stockton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
103 A. 922, 260 Pa. 372, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 524
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 25, 1918
DocketAppeal, No. 189
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 103 A. 922 (Stockton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stockton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 103 A. 922, 260 Pa. 372, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 524 (Pa. 1918).
Opinion
The clear contributory negligence of the plaintiff called for the direction from the court to the jury that he could not recover. The admission of the ordinance of the City of Philadelphia of June 27,1913, would not have helped him.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hynek v. City of Seattle
111 P.2d 247 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
Levine v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
4 Pa. D. & C. 269 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Tyrrell v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
79 Pa. Super. 346 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
103 A. 922, 260 Pa. 372, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stockton-v-philadelphia-rapid-transit-co-pa-1918.