Stockton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
103 A. 922, 260 Pa. 372, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 524
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 25, 1918·No. Appeal, No. 189·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The clear contributory negligence of the plaintiff called for the direction from the court to the jury that he could not recover. The admission of the ordinance of the City of Philadelphia of June 27,1913, would not have helped him.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stockton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 103 A. 922, 260 Pa. 372, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 524 (Pa. 1918).
103 A. 922 (Stockton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hynek v. City of Seattle
111 P.2d 247 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
Levine v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
4 Pa. D. & C. 269 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Tyrrell v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
79 Pa. Super. 346 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)