Stockton v. Garland
14 Mich. 333, 1866 Mich. LEXIS 40
Opinion
This was an appeal in chancery from the Genesee Circuit. Notice of hearing was served before the full time for returning the appeal had elapsed.
The Court held that under rule 19 such notice could not be given previous to the expiration of the time for returning the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stockton v. Garland, 14 Mich. 333, 1866 Mich. LEXIS 40 (Mich. 1866).
14 Mich. 333 (Stockton v. Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Byrne v. Gypsum Plaster & Stucco Co.
104 N.W. 410 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)
Miles v. Goffinet
16 Mich. 280 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1868)