Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Co.

261 A.D. 969, 26 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 969 (Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Co., 261 A.D. 969, 26 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a declaratory judgment to declare a certain fair trade agreement promulgated by the defendant to be ineffective, invalid and abandoned, plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and from the judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to such order. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (James v. Alderton Bock Yards, 256 N. Y. 298; Ferran v. Woodside Wine & Liquor Store, Inc., 256 App. Div. 1103.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [175 Mise. 314.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a declaratory judgment to declare a certain fair trade agreement promulgated by the defendant to be ineffective, invalid and abandoned, plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and from the judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to such order. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (James v. Alderton Bock Yards, 256 N. Y. 298; Ferran v. Woodside Wine & Liquor Store, Inc., 256 App. Div. 1103.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [175 Mise. 314.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 969, 26 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stockman-v-wilson-distilling-co-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack