Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Co.

261 A.D. 969, 26 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8369

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for a declaratory judgment to declare a certain fair trade agreement promulgated by the defendant to be ineffective, invalid and abandoned, plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and from the judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to such order. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (James v. Alderton Bock Yards, 256 N. Y. 298; Ferran v. Woodside Wine & Liquor Store, Inc., 256 App. Div. 1103.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [175 Mise. 314.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a declaratory judgment to declare a certain fair trade agreement promulgated by the defendant to be ineffective, invalid and abandoned, plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and from the judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to such order. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (James v. Alderton Bock Yards, 256 N. Y. 298; Ferran v. Woodside Wine & Liquor Store, Inc., 256 App. Div. 1103.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [175 Mise. 314.]

Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Co., 261 A.D. 969, 26 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 969 (Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related