Stockman v. State

120 S.W.2d 267, 135 Tex. Crim. 337, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 703
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 12, 1938·No. No. 19962.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Graves, Judge.

Conviction for the theft of an automobile; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of exceptions or statement of facts. There appears in the transcript an affidavit filed in the trial court setting up the inability of appellant to pay for a statement of facts or to give security therefor. There is nothing to show that said affidavit was called to the attention of the trial judge. It follows that a reversal of the judgment on the ground that appellant has been deprived of a statement of facts would not be warranted. Fuller v. State, 264 S. W. 953; Beddingfield v. State, 93 S. W. (2d) 738; Kelley v. State, 91 S. W. (2d) 343; Moore v. State, 104 S. W. (2d) 862.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stockman v. State, 120 S.W.2d 267, 135 Tex. Crim. 337, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 703 (Tex. 1938).

120 S.W.2d 267 (Stockman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Thorbus
455 S.W.2d 756 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)