Stocking v. Laas
This text of 199 S.W. 500 (Stocking v. Laas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant has not filed briefs in this court, and appellee has filed a brief which is not in compliance with rule 42 for the government of Courts of Civil Appeals (142 S. W. xiv), and the judgment cannot be affirmed, but the appeal will be dismissed. To have entitled appellee to an af-firmance of the judgment the case should have been briefed by appellee as provided in the rule cited. Suderman v. Dolson, 122 S. W, 401, and authorities therein cited; Southwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. Denny, 187 S. W. 973.
The appeal is dismissed. -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 S.W. 500, 1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stocking-v-laas-texapp-1917.