Stockett v. Ryan
34 A. 973, 176 Pa. 71, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1044
Opinion
The findings of fact made by the learned judge sitting as a chancellor in this case fully justify the decree appealed from. These findings are not absolutely conclusive upon us, but until error in them is clearly shown, they should be allowed to stand. We have examined the evidence with a view to satisfy ourselves whether these findings can be fairly made from it, and we are not persuaded that any one of them should be overturned. The decree is affirmed. Costs to be paid by the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stockett v. Ryan, 34 A. 973, 176 Pa. 71, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1044 (Pa. 1896).
34 A. 973 (Stockett v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palermo Estate
34 Pa. D. & C.2d 581 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1963)
Elliott Estate
4 Pa. D. & C.2d 462 (Elk County Orphans' Court, 1955)
Rekas v. Dopkavich
66 A.2d 230 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Long v. Tradesmens Natl. B. T. Co.
165 A. 56 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Denlinger v. Denlinger
7 Pa. D. & C. 484 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Brendle's Exr. v. Brendle
118 A. 502 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Altaffer v. Anderson Automobile Co.
77 Pa. Super. 63 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Canavan v. Paye
34 Pa. Super. 91 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Steinmeyer v. Siebert
42 A. 880 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)