Stocker v. Van Natta

Supreme Court of Florida

Stocker v. Van Natta

126 So. 299, 99 Fla. 270

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 3, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *271 inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees ; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the circuit court be, and the same aré hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *271 inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees ; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the circuit court be, and the same aré hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Stocker v. Van Natta, 126 So. 299, 99 Fla. 270 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

126 So. 299 (Stocker v. Van Natta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.