Stocker v. Stocker

124 So. 3d 293, 2013 WL 5226553, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14842
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 18, 2013
DocketNo. 2D12-4980
StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 3d 293 (Stocker v. Stocker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stocker v. Stocker, 124 So. 3d 293, 2013 WL 5226553, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14842 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because lack of personal jurisdiction in the domesticating state is not a ground to refuse enforcement of a foreign judgment, we affirm. See Hinchee v. Golden Oak Bank, 540 So.2d 262, 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (“It is well established that a foreign judgment may be challenged on grounds that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the person.” (emphasis added)); see also In re Estate of O’Keefe, 833 So.2d 157, 160 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (discussing grounds to challenge a foreign judgment).

KELLY, WALLACE, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of O'Keefe
833 So. 2d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Hinchee v. Golden Oak Bank
540 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 So. 3d 293, 2013 WL 5226553, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stocker-v-stocker-fladistctapp-2013.