Stocker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stocker v. State

17 So. 3d 891, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13773, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1897

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 16, 2009·No. 4D09-1085·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s rule 3.800 motion requesting additional jail credit for time served after a detainer was placed on him in Palm Beach County and following his arrest in St. Lucie County on a Broward warrant. This affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant re-filing the motion with supporting documentation, including the St. Lucie County arrest affidavit that he provided with a letter after his motion was denied. The documentation should demonstrate when the detainer was placed on him in Palm Beach County and include a copy of the State’s “no file” notice.

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s rule 3.800 motion requesting additional jail credit for time served after a detainer was placed on him in Palm Beach County and following his arrest in St. Lucie County on a Broward warrant. This affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant re-filing the motion with supporting documentation, including the St. Lucie County arrest affidavit that he provided with a letter after his motion was denied. The documentation should demonstrate when the detainer was placed on him in Palm Beach County and include a copy of the State’s “no file” notice.

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Stocker v. State, 17 So. 3d 891, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13773, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1897 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

17 So. 3d 891 (Stocker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.