Stocker v. Lawrence
This text of 1923 OK 715 (Stocker v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The plaintiff commenced his action in the district court of Haskell county against the defendant for the possession of certain real estate, or in lieu thereof, a money judgment. In the trial of the cause judgment went for the plaintiff, and the defendant has brought error to this court for review. This cause was regularly assigned and submitted with notice to the attorneys for the respective parties. The plaintiff in error has filed brief containing argument and authorities that reasonably tends to support errors assigned for *46 reversal If the defendant in error fails to file brief as required by the rules of this court, the record will not be examined for some'theory to support the judgment of the trial court, but will be reversed and remanded. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weaver, 67 Okla. 293, 171 Pac. 34. Therefore it is recommended that this cause be reversed and remanded.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1923 OK 715, 220 P. 635, 94 Okla. 45, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stocker-v-lawrence-okla-1923.