Stockdall v. TG Investments, Inc.

178 F. Supp. 3d 810, 26 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1185, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50039, 2016 WL 1464645
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedApril 14, 2016
DocketCase No. 4:14CV01557 ERW
StatusPublished

This text of 178 F. Supp. 3d 810 (Stockdall v. TG Investments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stockdall v. TG Investments, Inc., 178 F. Supp. 3d 810, 26 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1185, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50039, 2016 WL 1464645 (E.D. Mo. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court after a non-jury trial to address the claims asserted by Plaintiffs Jerry Stockdall and Christina Stockdall in their Amended Complaint [ECF No. 13]. A one-day bench trial on these matters was held before this Court on January 11, 2016. The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions 'of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a).

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

Plaintiffs Jerry Stockdall and Christina Stockdall (“Plaintiffs”) bring this suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., and the Missouri Minimum Wage Law (“MMWL”), Mo. Rev. Stat. § 290.505, et seq. against Defendants TGI Investments, Inc. and George Shipman (“Defendants”). Plaintiffs are Missouri residents who worked for Defendants at the Chateau Inn and Suites in Cuba, Missouri. Defendants are the owners of the Chateau Inn and Suites and Plaintiffs’ employer. Jurisdiction and venue are proper.

Plaintiffs allege Defendants failed to pay Ms. Stockdall regular wages and Defendants ■ failed to pay both Mr. ■ and Ms. Stockdall for overtime wages. Plaintiffs seek an award of lost regular wages for Ms. Stockdall, lost overtime wages for Mr. and Ms. Stockdall, and liquidated damages.1 Plaintiffs also allege Defendants retaliated against Plaintiffs for filing this lawsuit by asserting baseless counterclaims against Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs asserted five counts against Defendants: (I) Violation of the FLSA and MMWL through Christina Stockdall, (II) Violation of the FLSA and MMWL through Jerry Stock-dall, (III) Slander/Defamation, (IV) Conversion, and (V) FLSA Retaliation. Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed Counts III and IV. In its Memorandum and Order on summary judgment, the Court determined Ms. Stockdall was an employee of Defendants and was owed wages for the hours in which she worked, Ms. Stockdall was owed overtime wages for any hours over forty for which she worked each week, and Mr. Stockdall was owed overtime wages for any hours over forty for which he worked each week. The Court also determined Plaintiffs were entitled to liquidated damages as Defendants did not qualify for the exception. The Court did not determine the amounts of damages Plaintiffs were owed.

At the one-day bench trial on this matter, Plaintiffs presented their case-in-chief by calling two witnesses, Christina and Jerry Stockdall. Defendants did not call any witnesses or present any evidence. Plaintiffs introduced several documents into evidence. The Court makes the following findings of fact based on the evidence presented and the reasonable inferences derived therefrom.

A. Testimony of Cristina Stockdall

Cristina Stockdall is married to Jerry Stockdall. Trial Tr. 10:1-4. Ms. Stockdall heard about the Chateau Inn and Suites was hiring live-in managers in April 2013 when she was on her honeymoon anniversary. Trial Tr. 10:5-9. Ms. Stockdall and Mr. Stockdall applied for the position and were interviewed by George Shipman. Trial Tr. 10:11-16. Mr. and Ms. Stockdall were hired on the same day of the interview and were told to gather their belongings and move in to the motel to start working as live-in managers. Trial Tr. 11:1-6. They were told they would be paid $700, every two weeks, by a check in Mr. Stockdall’s name. Trial Tr. 11:7-12. The Stockdalls moved in. to the motel on May 3, 2013. [813]*813Trial Tr. 11:16-17. The Stockdalls were trained by Dana Rodrigues for four days. Trial Tr. 11:1-12:3. After Ms. Rodriguez trained the Stockdalls, Mr. and Ms. Stock-dall were left in charge of running the Chateau’s day-to-day operations. Trial Tr. 12:19-21.

Mr. and Ms. Stockdall had individual job duties. Trial Tr. 12:22-24. Ms. Stockdall woke up around 5:00 each morning to prepare and set out breakfast by 6:00 a,m. Trial Tr. 13:5-6. After preparing breakfast, Ms. Stockdall filled out sales reports, determined which rooms had been rented, and filled out maid reports, while making sure the coffee was fresh and the breakfast remained stocked for guests. Trial Tr. 7-16. While Ms. Stockdall was preparing breakfast, she carried a phone with her, so if a guest arrived at the front desk, she would be able to provide assistance. Trial Tr. 14:3-24. These duties would take, until approximately 9:00 a.m. each day. Trial Tr. 15:4-6. After finishing breakfast and her morning paperwork, Ms. Stockdall would assign the housekeepers rooms to be cleaned and would check guests out of the motel. Trial Tr. 15:8-17. From checkout at 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Ms. Stockdall would manage the front desk, check the rooms the maids had cleaned, check in with the office, George Shipman or Tina Shipman, about any questions regarding paperwork and answer any phone calls from guests. Trial Tr. 15:20-16:13.

At 11:00 p.m., the Stockdalls would lock the doors, put a phone in the foyer and a phone on the front desk with signs instructing guests to hit zero on the phone if they needed assistance for towels, new room keys, or other miscellaneous needs. Trial Tr. 16:15-22. Throughout the night, the Stockdalls received between five and ten calls a night, on average, from guests. Trial Tr. 17:10-16. The Stockdalls were trained to keep the lobby open from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and then to put a sign next to. the phone should someone need assistance. Trial Tr. 18:6-8. They would take turns answering calls throughout the night and respond to guest inquiries. Trial Tr. 18:9-12. There were nights where both Mr. and Ms. Stockdall would need to assist guests at the same time. Trial Tr. 13-17.

This-was the Stockdalls’ routine every week for the entire time they worked at the Chateau. Trial Tr. 18:18-24. Every week, Ms. Stockdall was given twenty-four hours off in six to eight hour increments. Trial Tr. 18:25-19:5. Mr.' and Ms. Stockdall were required to supervise the front desk for all remaining hours. Trial Tr. 19:16-23. Mr. and Ms. Stockdall were not permitted to leave the property at the same time unless there was a relief manager on the property. Trial Tr. 19:25-20:3. There were only two times throughout their time working at,the Chateau where they left the property for more than five hours. Trial Tr. 20:4-8.

Mr. and Ms. Stockdall were in charge of administering payroll for Chateau employees. Trial Tr. 20:14-16. Payroll consisted of calculating the amount of rooms cleaned by housekeepers and the amount of hours the laundry person had been at the motel. Trial Tr. 20:17-20. Payroll was completed every two weeks. Trial Tr. 20:21-22. The payroll only included hours for Ms. Stock-dall in which she worked as a housekeeper or did laundry; it did not include any hours for her time working as a manager. Trial Tr. 21:1-9. With Mr. Shipman’s permission, Ms.. Stockdall was periodically paid, for laundry or housekeeping work when one of the employees was unable to work. Tidal Tr. 24:13-25:7. Ms. Stockdall was paid a total of $894.01. Trial Ex. P-15. Ms. Stock-dall received no other payment for her work at the Chateau. Trial Tr. 30:6-9.

Ms. Stockdall also filled out sales reports which reported the number of rooms rented each night. Trial Tr. 31:21-32:23. While Mr. and Ms. Stockdall worked at the [814]*814motel, Ms. Stockdall’s mother stayed at the motel three times without paying for the rooms. Trial Tr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
328 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Mullins v. City of New York
626 F.3d 47 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Donovan v. Williams Chemical Co., Inc.
682 F.2d 185 (Eighth Circuit, 1982)
Margaret White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Co.
699 F.3d 869 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
Chao v. Barbeque Ventures, LLC
547 F.3d 938 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Donald Shrable v. Eaton Corporation
695 F.3d 768 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 F. Supp. 3d 810, 26 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1185, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50039, 2016 WL 1464645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stockdall-v-tg-investments-inc-moed-2016.