Stockdale v. Stockdale
This text of Stockdale v. Stockdale (Stockdale v. Stockdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Present: All the Justices
DONALD KARL STOCKDALE, JR.
v. Record No. 002485 PER CURIAM September 14, 2001 PATRICIA MAXWELL STOCKDALE
FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
We awarded this appeal to review a judgment of the Court
of Appeals holding that the trial court's statement that the
respondent, Donald Karl Stockdale, Jr., bore the burden of
showing by a preponderance of the evidence that his
relationship with his children would be substantially impaired
by their relocation was error, but that the error was
harmless. Stockdale v. Stockdale, 33 Va. App. 179, 532 S.E.2d
332 (2000).
For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Court of
Appeals, we will affirm that court's judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stockdale v. Stockdale, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stockdale-v-stockdale-va-2001.