Stockdale v. State

431 N.E.2d 975, 55 N.Y.2d 788, 447 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3307
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 1981·No. Claim No. 61997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[790] OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Court of Claims reinstated. The findings made by the Court of Claims regarding value were supported by evidence in the record and adequately explained (see Matter of City of New York [A & W Realty Corp.], 1 NY2d 428) and affirmed by the Appellate Division. The value assigned to the remaining buildings Upon the subject property before the partial appropriation and the value thereafter were within the range of the expert testimony and yielded, upon calculation, a total of $10,000 in consequential damages. The Appellate Division thus erred, as a matter of law, in holding that there was no range of evidence on this element of damages.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stockdale v. State, 431 N.E.2d 975, 55 N.Y.2d 788, 447 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3307 (N.Y. 1981).

431 N.E.2d 975 (Stockdale v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rider v. State
192 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Townhomes of Millbrooke, Inc. v. State
88 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)