Stockbridge-Munsee Cmty. v. State
299 F. Supp. 3d 1026
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin
DecidedOctober 25, 2017
Docket17–cv–249–jdp
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 299 F. Supp. 3d 1026 (Stockbridge-Munsee Cmty. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stockbridge-Munsee Cmty. v. State, 299 F. Supp. 3d 1026 (W.D. Wis. 2017).
Opinion
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion to strike, Dkt. 48, is DENIED.
2. Defendant the Ho-Chunk Nation's motion for judgment on the pleadings, Dkt. 56, is GRANTED.
3. Defendant the Ho-Chunk Nation is DISMISSED from this lawsuit.
4. Plaintiff the Stockbridge-Munsee Community's motion for a preliminary injunction, Dkt. 7, is DENIED as moot.
5. Defendant the Ho-Chunk Nation's motion for leave to file a sur-reply, Dkt. 41, is DENIED as moot.
6. Plaintiff's motion for leave to supplement its motion for a preliminary injunction, Dkt. 63, is DENIED as moot.
7. Plaintiff and defendants the State of Wisconsin and Scott Walker may file briefs or otherwise inform the court of their positions on the timeliness of *1034plaintiff's claims by November 8, 2017.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stockbridge-Munsee Community v. State of Wisconsin
Seventh Circuit, 2019
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
299 F. Supp. 3d 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stockbridge-munsee-cmty-v-state-wiwd-2017.